Design Features

Compliant with AS/NZS 4024.3610/3611

Robust design with low deflection

Low design implementation time

Cost effective solution

Low complexity of mesh bends

No welding required for guarding panel

Minimum welding for guarding post

Easy Installation and removal

Mass production of components through tooling

Not hot works required for repairs on site

Stocked components for replacement/repairs

Minimum dust/material build-up on locking mechanism and posts

Traditional

Yes

Moderate

Moderate

-

-

-

-

Moderate

-

-

-

-

Sentry Guarding System

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Downsides

• Complex design
• Intricate assembly
• Heavy guarding post
• Bulky package for transport
• Complex configuration not
possible (corner or T-junction
not possible)
• Fabrication complexity
• Thread inspection and rework
required after HDG
• High number of components
• Dust/material build-up inside
cup style

Features

• Simplified Guarding Post
• Less overhang
• Quick and easy assembly
• Less point of failure
• Lighter guarding post
• Compact package for transport
• Complex configuration possible
(corner, T or Quad junction is
possible)
• Easy fabrication
• No inspection or rework required
after HDG
• Reduced number of components
• Minimum dust/material build-up

Downsides

• High risk locking mechanism failure
• Complex mesh panel fabrication / bending
• Welding required
• Fabricated replacement parts

Features

• Mesh locking tab mechanism
• Custom sizes available
• No welding required
• Limited risk of locking mechanism failure
• Stocked replacement components

Sentry Guarding System